Relatives' Heartache Regarding Coastal Degradation Threatening Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.