🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's youth". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban could be "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a proposal increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," commented a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further access dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring guardian approval for minors to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various figures to mimic Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in safety.

While this international conversation continues, the steps of this nation and others demonstrate that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.